Philosophy
To engage the Australian democratic political system in an honest, holistic,
egalitarian, and non-sectarian manner to the benefit of all Australians,
creating an environment in which all individuals can attain their potential.
Aim
To establish an Australian political party based on this philosophy,
empowering Australians to enhance the economic, environmental, social,
cultural, political, and recreational aspects of the Australian lifestyle.
Method
To develop policies which reflect the philosophy and aims of the Australian
Fishing and Lifestyle Party
Policies—General Framework
- Favour
private enterprise system to build a solid economic base, small
government and bureaucracy
- Use
solid economic base to provide social and cultural infrastructure
- Australian
sovereignty as primacy over international obligations
- Secure
our borders
- Economic
and compassionate immigration at levels Australia’s social infrastructure
is capable of handling
- Recognise
that modern transport and communications make state boundaries
less relevant, and standardisation of services Australia-wide is
in Australia’s interest
- Use
scientific, factual information in the decision-making process
- Responsible
environmental interactions and factual environmental education
are paramount to ensure ecosystem conservation, sustainable harvest,
and scientific monitoring
- Respect
and encourage ethnic diversity within Australia
- Recognise
the value of research and investment into new economic activities
Policies--Specific
Fishing industry, commercial
- Current
situation: Australia imports 70% of our seafood consumption
at a cost of $1.8 billion annually
- Australian
marine ecosystems are vast and well-managed, with the potential to
sustainably supply all our seafood needs
- The health
benefits of a seafood-based diet are enormous
- Australia’s
aquaculture industry is at present small, but has vast potential
- Sustainable,
scientifically monitored fishing does not damage ecosystems
or biodiversity
- The aquaculture
industry in Australia has not caused environmental damage
- Australia
has a responsibility to economically manage its exclusive economic
zones, or other countries may petition the world in the International
Tribunal for the Law of the Sea for access to our exclusive economic
zones
- Failure
to sustainably harvest our marine resource exports environmental
problems to other countries less able to protect their marine environments,
e.g. Thailand
- The method
of commercial fishing must be considered in discussions on sustainability,
e.g. line fishing versus net fishing
- Professional
fisherman ideally should be based in a recognised geographical area,
and have a responsibility for the sustainability of their harvest
Fishing, amateur
- Amateur fishing is a social, cultural, and traditional right of all
Australians
- Amateur fishing is a regular pastime of at least 20% of the Australian
population
- Amateur fishing has huge economic importance to the Australian community
- Managed amateur fishing has no effect on biodiversity or sustainability
of the marine ecosystem
- Amateur fishing has huge tourist potential and economic spin-offs
- Amateur fishing is excluded from less than 1% of American continental
waters
- Amateur fishing is a cross-generational, traditional Australian recreational
activity which should be encouraged at all levels of Australian government
Environment Policy Principles
- Humans are part of life on earth
- It is appropriate for humans to interact in all earth’s ecosystems
- Human environmental interaction should be responsible based on the
principles of ecosystem conservation, biodiversity conservation, sustainable
harvest, and scientific monitoring of human interaction
- Education
is preferable to “lock out.” Facts and science,
not emotion and politics should guide human interactions
- All ecosystems continually change, with a process of degeneration
and regeneration occurring through time
Marine Protected Areas (MPAs)
- They are necessary for research and monitoring of the ecosystem and
to establish a baseline of biodiversity and biomass within the ecosystem
- They should be small, representative, and easily policed
- Marine Protected Areas do not prevent the effects of climate change,
pollution, natural disasters such as extreme weather events, oil spills,
etc.
- Sustainable fishing activities do not affect biodiversity or ecosystem
health
The Coral Sea
- Australia’s exclusive economic zone within the Coral Sea covers an
area of approximately $1 million square kilometres
- These are not territorial waters, and are not ours by right
- Our access to this exclusive economic zone can be challenged by other
countries
- The ecosystem of the Coral Sea is at present almost pristine, despite
long-term human activities
- Only
2% or 23,000 square kilometres of Australia’s Coral Sea is coral-bearing. The
other 98% is deep, trackless ocean
- 60%
of the coral-bearing area of the Coral Sea has been protected for
the last 25 years. The
biodiversity of corals and fish within the coral-bearing 2% of
the Coral Sea is far less than the biodiversity of the Great Barrier
Reef.
- There are no resident pelagic fish within the Coral Sea, they all
migrate through the southwest Pacific
- The Battle of the Coral Sea did not occur within Australia’s exclusive
economic zone, but to the north in the waters of Papua New Guinea and
the Solomons
- The
declaration of the Coral Sea Heritage Park was an inappropriate
political and emotional decision based on misinformation from the
American Pew environmental group, which achieves nothing positive
for Australia or for the Coral Sea ecosystem.
- Australians have a right to access and harvest sustainably our Coral
Sea zone, having regard for the good environmental principles already
stated
- The USA under the Coral Sea Tuna Treaty harvests $1 billion worth
of tuna from the Coral Sea waters to the north of Australia’s exclusive
economic zone.
- A well-managed tuna fishery within Australia’s exclusive economic
zone would have enormous economic benefits for northeastern Australia,
and the Australian economy in general, without having detrimental effects
on the biodiversity or ecosystem conservation of the Coral Sea, and
this could co-exist with amateur fishing, tourism, and dive activities.
- As the Coral Sea is at present pristine, effectively protected and
managed and faces no immediate threats, precipitous action is unnecessary.
All options can be considered in a timely manner to ensure the best
outcome for all Australians.
Aquaculture
- Has
been the most rapidly growing protein source in the last ten years
worldwide
- Australia
is ideally suited to have a major aquaculture industry with high
water quality, an extensive coastline and the scientific know how
- Only
1/1000 of world aquaculture production is in Australia
- There
have been no new aquaculture ventures for the last seven years
due to ‘red tape’ inhibitions
- The
highly successful Atlantic Salmon aquaculture industry in Tasmania
produces 3 times the annual catch from the Great Barrier Reef without
environmental hazards
- Aquaculture
has vast potential to increase sea food production as well as protect
Australia’s marine ecosystems
Riparian
Zone Policy
- Clearing
of river banks has caused serious degradation to terrestrial, aquatic
and marine ecosystems
- Revegetation
of river banks is the most practical significant national environmental
initiative that Australia can take
- Revegetation
of just three to five metres from the river bank is all that is
required to relieve environmental degradation
Benefits
- Sea
conservation
- Aquatic
and Marine ecosystem production
- Planting
and harvesting timber trees by decreasing the pressure on native
forests
- Source
of employment with a ‘Green Army’
- Aesthetic
and lifestyle ‘spin-offs’
G.B.R.M.PA
- A self
serving forty million dollar bureaucracy which has lost direction,
perspective, public trust and confidence.
Why? Because:
- Deceitful
interaction with the fishing community
- Debacle
of green zones with no respect for disastrous effects on community,
particularly on marine support services at a cost in excess of
$300 million
- Unsubstantiated
claims of threats to reef to justify government funding
- Negative effect on reef tourism
- Negative publicity
- Costs
- Regulations
- Stifling
independent research by denying access
- Deceptive
public surveys and education
Solution:
- Redefine
the role of GBRMPA within its charter.
- Focus on real problems and solutions.
- Develop private enterprise in marine service to improve quality and
perspective of the science involved.
- Publish all publicly funded science
- Establish meaningful interaction with shareholders.
Great Barrier Reef
- Reef
ecosystem which extends from Great Dividing Range to the continental
shelf
- Has an area of 350 000 square kilometres – consists of 2500 reefs
which stretch from Cape York to Rockhampton. (Length of 2000 kilometres)
- Is
8000 years old and formed in the last significant sea rise of a
100 metres
- It
is a robust ecosystem capable of adapting to environmental changes
- After
200 years of European interaction the reef is in pristine condition
and under no immediate threat
- Is
the least fished of all major coral reefs
- Annual Catch (Great Barrier Reef) 25 kg/square kilometre
- Annual
Catch (World Reef) 7000 kg/square kilometre
- Human
intervention has produced no new major threats to the survivability
of reef ecosystems
Existing
threats to reefs are;
- Natural
weather events such as cyclones
- Climate change
- Sea level change
These
factors are not human related
- Pollution,
siltation, Crown of Thorns, eutrophication, anchors, spear guns,
algal blooms and overfishing are all regularly cited but are not
significant threats
Authorised
by Robert Erskine 51 Mulgrave Rd., Cairns QLD 4870
[ Close
this Window ]
|